|
Manchester
Congress 2003.
By Boris
Ewart
Championship
Pairs
1st
Bernard & Rhona Goldenfield.
This came up
in the qualifying round. David Audley was wise to remove the double:
|
Brd 10
Dlr E
Vul All
|
KJ98752
73
10832
-
|
|
|
103
1096
Q76
AQJ32
|
|
Q64
AQJ5
K94
1094
|
|
|
A
K842
AJ5
K8754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W
|
N
|
E
|
S
|
|
|
|
1NT
|
No
|
|
No
|
2
|
No
|
No!
|
|
3
|
No
|
No
|
X
|
|
No
|
3
|
End
|
|
3 was 1 down after N was repeatedly forced so could not enjoy the
long trick. In 3 -X W has 4 tricks, 3 tricks and 1 trick. However careful play will park the 10 on the 3rd winner and the the play of the
6 from E will enable the 3 to be made
en-passant for the 9th trick.
Board 24 was
a missed opportunity:
|
KQ53
Q
82
AQ9832
|
|
62
AKJ1097
A73
KJ
|
|
W
|
N
|
E
|
S
|
|
1
|
No
|
2
|
No
|
|
3
|
No
|
3
|
No
|
|
3
|
No
|
4
|
No
|
|
4
|
No
|
4NT*
|
No
|
|
5 *
|
No
|
5
|
End
|
E(Jim Luck)
was worried about a lead if W did not have the A or the Q. I think I should have bid 5 instead of 4 - clearly asking for a control then E can bid the slam.
Adrian
Kenworthy got away with this one in the final:
|
Brd 5
Dlr N
Vul N-S
|
AKQ93
103
AK952
K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J6542
A42
104
AQ7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W
|
N
|
E
|
S
|
|
|
1
|
No
|
2 !
|
|
No
|
4NT*
|
No
|
6
|
|
No
|
7
|
End
|
|
|
He bid 2 to ‘inhibit the lead’ and reasoned that 4NT was
based on a fit so bid 6 . N of course raised to 7 .
Championship
Teams
1st
Michelle Brunner, ‘Pablo’ Cassells, John Hassett and Bill Hirst.
This came up
in the qualifying round and is an example of a pseudo suicide double-squeeze:
|
Brd 24
Dlr W
Vul Nil
|
10952
QJ87
72
Q108
|
|
|
3
AK94
A1043
K432
|
|
AQJ4
652
Q65
A65
|
|
|
K876
103
KJ98
J97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W
|
N
|
E
|
S
|
|
1
|
No
|
1
|
No
|
|
1NT
|
No
|
3NT
|
End
|
N led the 7 to 2, 10 and A. The only winning line is to duck a
, win return with K then to Q and K. If S returns 9 win 10 and to J and K. You can now cash 9 tricks as are 3-3. If S returns a win K and to J and K. Later you finesse S for J.
At the table
I won A and played 3 to 5, J and K. 3 was ducked to 8 and Q came back to K – S discarded 7 as he felt he was guarding the suit. I tried to Q and K. Back came 9 to 10. I cashed A and N discarded 8 as he also thought he was guarding the suit. I let N have the 9 to J just in case S had 4 so I could
squeeze him in & when the were cashed. The 9th trick was the 4.
Aggressive
bidding led to this lucky game in the final:
|
Brd 5
Dlr N
Vul N-S
|
KJ102
QJ
AJ9
A963
|
|
|
A7
K8
K875
KQ874
|
|
Q8653
A10963
Q64
-
|
|
|
94
7542
1032
J1052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W
|
N
|
E
|
S
|
|
|
1
|
2 *
|
No
|
|
3NT
|
End
|
|
|
Because of
the favourable position and S having no entry, this has a cold 9 tricks.
|
The next
board is a discovery play:
|
Brd 18
Dlr E
Vul N-S
|
76
A83
| |